Difference between revisions of "ComputationalCortexModel"
From aHuman Wiki
(Automated page entry using MWPush.pl) |
(Automated page entry using MWPush.pl) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<pre style="color: green">Computational Cortex Model</pre> | <pre style="color: green">Computational Cortex Model</pre> | ||
@@[[Home]] -> [[NeoCortexResearch]] -> [[ComputationalCortexModel]] | @@[[Home]] -> [[NeoCortexResearch]] -> [[ComputationalCortexModel]] | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
* consider sequence - word "concatenation" | * consider sequence - word "concatenation" | ||
| − | + | ** sequences are based on emotional stressing - con-cate-nation | |
| − | + | ** consider you start hearing "ncate" | |
| − | + | ** you will ignore "n" as it could be part of "in category" | |
| − | + | ** you will surely map "cate" to strong subsequence | |
| − | + | ** so your expected word will be "cate-gory" | |
| − | + | ** you will recognise "(con)-cate-nation" - after hearing "nation" - like you go to wrong direction then confused and returned to the forked way | |
* consider similarity between invariant representation in neocortex and error function as content of feed-forward flow | * consider similarity between invariant representation in neocortex and error function as content of feed-forward flow | ||
| − | + | ** invariant representation of auditory information - relative intervals, not absolute notes are stored and recognized | |
Latest revision as of 19:05, 28 November 2018
Computational Cortex Model
@@Home -> NeoCortexResearch -> ComputationalCortexModel
This page covers describing model of neocortex region which satisfies requirements. The model show architectural implementation details which demonstrate how required workflow cases are implemented.
Thoughts
- consider sequence - word "concatenation"
- sequences are based on emotional stressing - con-cate-nation
- consider you start hearing "ncate"
- you will ignore "n" as it could be part of "in category"
- you will surely map "cate" to strong subsequence
- so your expected word will be "cate-gory"
- you will recognise "(con)-cate-nation" - after hearing "nation" - like you go to wrong direction then confused and returned to the forked way
- consider similarity between invariant representation in neocortex and error function as content of feed-forward flow
- invariant representation of auditory information - relative intervals, not absolute notes are stored and recognized
